CLINICAL DIABETES
VOL. 14 NO. 3 MAY/JUNE
1996
These pages are best viewed with Netscape version 3.0 or higher or Internet Explorer version 3.0 or higher. When viewed with other browsers, some characters or attributes may not be rendered correctly.
FEATURE ARTICLE
Efficacy of Medical Nutrition Therapy: Are Your Patients Getting What They Need?
Marie Karlsen, RD,CDE, and Leslie Lobeda Thomson, MS,RD
The year is 1797, and you have just been diagnosed with diabetes by John Rollo, the famous English Surgeon General of the Royal Artillery. For your meal plan, Dr. Rollo suggests a diet consisting of animal products with an entire abstinence of every kind of vegetable matter. A sample menu might have been: a mixture of lime water with milk and bread and butter for breakfast, plain blood pudding made with only blood and suet for lunch, and old, rancid meat and fat for supper, to be followed by opium for dessert.1
The history of diabetes nutritional management reveals a wide spectrum of such unpalatable diets. From the all-carbohydrate diet of Artaeus the Cappadocian in 5 AD to the Fredrick Allen starvation treatment in 1912,1 medical professionals have been searching for the most efficacious method of managing the nutrition of people with diabetes.
In the recent past, the most common method of nutrition counseling was the exchange list meal plan, with the efficacy reliant on how, when, and where the information had been presented. An often-used counseling technique, with less than optimum results, consisted of handing the patient a pre-printed diet in the doctors office at the time of diagnosis, with an arbitrarily set calorie level and the expectation that individuals would permanently tailor their lifestyles to fit the meal plan.
A study recently published by Franz and associates2 supports the medical and economical benefits of diabetes medical nutrition therapy (MNT) when provided by registered dietitians who are also certified diabetes educators with 513 years of experience in the field of nutrition and diabetes. A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial of two levels of MNT for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) was conducted. Basic nutrition care, which consisted of a single visit, was compared to practice guideline nutrition care, which consisted of an initial visit with a dietitian followed by two visits during the first 6 weeks of the study period.
The study compared medical outcomes of fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and serum lipid levels, and clinical outcomes including weight, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and changes in medical therapy. Study results at 6 months indicated improved glycemic control and weight loss in both nutrition intervention groups and improved cholesterol values in the practice guidelines nutrition care group. The study concluded that MNT was effective in improving medical and clinical outcomes.
In Brief |
| The efficacy of medical nutrition therapy is dependent on several factors and encompasses both art and science. Utilizing a registered dietitian with experience in diabetes management can prove beneficial in matching appropriate nutrition interventions and education tools to a particular individual with NIDDM or IDDM. Medical nutrition therapy can be divided into three categories: 1) task, 2) guideline, and 3) meal planning. Medical nutrition therapy can be tailored to meet needs from survival skills at diagnosis to nutrient-specific needs for diabetes-related complications. |
Delahanty and Halford3 found lower HbA1c values in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) that were not associated with a specific meal plan or diet, but with the specific nutrition behaviors outlined in Table 1. Compliance with the meal plan, adjustment of insulin dose on the basis of expected food intake, and appropriate treatment of hypoglycemia should all be considered. Interestingly, no specific meal plan was identified as beneficial, but rather any nutrition intervention system that incorporated these nutrition behaviors resulted in lower HbA1c values.
The 1994 version of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Nutrition Recommendations and Principles for People with Diabetes Mellitus recognizes the benefit of individualizing nutritional care and that a one-size-fits-all approach to modifying eating habits cannot be effective.4
Many patients come to our clinic stating that they avoid sweets but cannot understand why their blood glucose levels are so variable. Individualized nutritional counseling by a registered dietitian experienced in diabetes management or a diabetes nutrition specialist can provide pertinent insight into food-related blood glucose problems. Educating individuals about how various nutrients (carbohydrate, protein, fat, alcohol) affect blood glucose can minimize many blood glucose fluctuations (see Table 2).
Table 1. Nutrition behaviors that improve blood glucose control |
| 1. Adherence to
meal plan 2. Appropriate treatment of hypo- glycemia 3. Prompt response to hyperglycemia 4. Consistent snacking behavior4 |
Food intake records, blood glucose logs, and exercise records can be useful tools to individualize strategies for coordinating eating patterns with diabetes medications and physical activity. Sometimes, just teaching an individual with diabetes that 100% of all carbohydrate food (whether from breads and starches or sweets and sucrose) is converted to glucose can prove beneficial.
Fifty to 60% of protein is typically utilized as blood glucose within 36 hours after ingestion. Fat has a limited direct effect on blood glucose, with 10% metabolized as blood glucose, usually about 8 hours after ingestion. Additionally, fat will slow the absorption of carbohydrate, occasionally resulting in hypoglycemia following a high-fat meal.
Effective medical nutrition counseling includes a comprehensive evaluation that considers type of diabetes, lipid profile, blood pressure, renal function, and weight history and goals, as well as lifestyle, schedule, and personal food preferences. Individual food choices are driven not only by the physiological requirements of nutrients, but also by the psychosocial relationship of food and the process of eating. This complex relationship often makes MNT the most challenging component of diabetes management.
| Table 2. How various nutrients affect blood glucose | ||
| Nutrient | % Nutrient Absorbed as Glucose | Time Required for Absorption |
| Carbohydrate Protein Fat |
100% 50-60% 10% |
5 min - 3 hours 3-6 hours 8 hours |
Table 3 outlines many issues related to nutrition goal outcomes that need to be considered when planning appropriate MNT. When considering the appropriate MNT approach for an individual with diabetes, particular attention needs to be given to usual food choices, food likes and dislikes, learning style, cultural issues, and socioeconomic status. Consider all of these factors when implementing guidelines for a specific individual.
Goals of MNT
The goals of MNT for people with diabetes include the following:2
1. Maintaining near-normal blood glucose levels by balancing food intake with insulin (either endogenous or exogenous) or oral glucose-lowering medications and activity levels.
2. Achieving optimal lipid levels. The guidelines provided by the Adult Treatment Panel II and the Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children and Adolescents of the National Cholesterol Education Program5 levels also apply to people with diabetes mellitus. Nutrition intervention plays a significant role in achieving recommended lipid levels.
3. Providing adequate calories for attaining reasonable weights for adults, fostering normal growth and development rates for children and adolescents, and meeting increased metabolic needs during pregnancy and lactation or recovery from catabolic illness. Reasonable weight for adults is defined by considering weight history and is a weight that both the individual and health professional feel is attainable and can be maintained over the long term.
4. Preventing, delaying, or treating nutrition-related risk factors and complications. Nutrition assessment and intervention are essential to reduce risk factors related to obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension (see Table 4).
5. Improving overall health through optimal nutrition. This seems to be an obvious goal of nutrition intervention, but some individuals become so focused on improving blood glucose that they lose sight of the importance of good nutrition.
| Table 3. Factors Assessed for Medical Nutrition Therapy |
| 1. Medical
history, including assessment of diabetes-related
complications, and bio- chemical and anthropometric
measures. 2. Current nutrition history, including food and alcohol record evaluation. 3. Psychosocial evaluation, including behaviors and attitudes towards food. 4. Sociological evaluation, including cultural practices, housing, cooking facilities, financial resources, and support of family and friends. 5. Readiness to learn or change and learning style evaluation. 6. Knowledge of blood glucose monitoring and glucose goals. 7. Current exercise and activity level. |
Table 4 provides an overview of recommendations ideally designed to be preventive nutrition strategies.3
| Table 4. Medical Nutrition Therapy Nutrient Recommendations | ||
Nutrient |
Recommendation |
Comments |
| Protein Sources: chicken, fish, meat, eggs, milk, tofu, nuts, peanut butter |
10-20% of total calories should come from protein sources. |
Research
indicated protein needs are similar for people with or
without diabetes. With
onset of nephropathy, limit protein to adult Some research studies suggest vegetable protein may not be as harmful to the kidneys as animal protein. |
| Carbohydrate Sources: starch (grains, bread,pasta, rice, potato, beans) milk, fruit, vegetables, sugar, honey, jam, molasses, etc. |
8090% of calories are divided between carbohydrate and fats based on individual risk factors and needs. Depending on nutritional assessment and medical nutritional therapy goals, this generally equates to 4560% of total calories from carbohydrate. | Total
carbohydrate intake has greater impact onblood glucose
control than source of carbohydrate, i.e. whether from
complex carbohydrate or sucrose. Sucrose and sucrose-containing foods should be consumed within the context of a healthful diet. These foods are often high in total carbohydrate and fat and low in vitamins and minerals. Individuals can be taught to substitute sucrose- containing foods for other carbohydrate foods in their meal plan. |
| Fat Sources: monounsaturated: olive and canola oils, avocado, nuts
saturated: |
60-70%
of total calories should be divided between
monounsaturated. fats and carbohydrates.
Less than 10% of total calories should be from saturated fats. Depending on nutritional assessment, total fat intake equates to 2535% of total calories. |
Individuals with diabetes, normal lipid levels, and
reasonable body weight should limit total fat to < 30%
of total calories and < 300 mg of dietary cholesterol
per day. If obesity and weight management are the primary issues, reducing total fat to reduce total calories and increasing exercise should be considered. If low density lipoprotein cholesterol is the primaryconcern, progression to National Cholesterol Education Program step II dietary guidelines (< 7% of total calories from saturated fat and < 200 mg cholesterol per day) should be implemented. Guidelines for reducing cardiovascular risk are emphasizednobody should exceed 10% of total calories from saturated fat. If elevated triglyceride and very low density lipoprotein cholesterol are the primary concerns, a moderate increase in monounsaturated fat intake, with < 10% of total calories from saturated fat, and a more moderate (slight decrease) in carbohydrate can be tried. Some studies have shown that a diet with increased total fat from monounsaturated fats can lower plas- ma triglycerides, glucose, and insulin levels more than a high-carbohydrate diet in some individuals. In individuals with triglyceride > 1000, reduction of all types of dietary fats to reduce levels of plasma dietary fat in the form of chylomicrons may be implemented. |
| Fiber | 20-35 grams per day --same recommendation as for individuals without diabetes. | Research suggests that, in the amounts typically consumed, fiber intake has very little impact on blood glucose levels. |
| Sodium | Same as for
general population: < 3000 mg per day. If hypertensive, individuals should
reduce sodium intake to are more salt-sensitive. Food selection guidelines: |
There is an association between hypertension and
both IDDM and NIDDM, with an increased risk for people
with NIDDM who are obese. There is also evidence that individuals with NIDDM |
| Alcohol | Insulin users: Limit to 2 drinks per day and so not cust back on food. Non-insulin
users: |
Abstinence is recommended for those with a history of
abuse and during pregnancy. Drink only with food. Alcohol can lead to hypoglycemia via inhibition of gluconeogenesis. Limit for weight loss and elevated triglycerides. |
| Mononutrients | The vitamin and mineral needs of people who are healty appear to be adequately met by the RDAs, which include a generous safety factor. | Individuals who are at greatest risk for vitamin/ mineral deficiency include those on extreme weight loss diets, strict vegetarians, the elderly, pregnant or lactating women, those taking medications known to alter micronutrient metabolism, people with poor glycemic control (i.e., glycosuria), people with malabsorption disorders, and people with congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction. |
Medical Nutrition Therapy:
A Definition
A plethora of approaches to MNT exist for diabetes nutrition specialists to use when developing a nutrition treatment plan. Any approach selected should strive to prioritize the goals as outlined in the 1994 ADA Nutrition Recommendations.4
For effective therapy to occur, individuals with diabetes are assessed and the goals for MNT are prioritized. All team members, especially the individual with diabetes, must have ownership of these goals. The prioritized goals receive the emphasis when developing the nutrition treatment plan. Continuous assessment is made to evaluate the importance of these and other goals, as additional medical and psychosocial data become available.
Modern diabetes nutrition therapy no longer puts people on diets, but instead develops nutrition treatment plans around an individuals current lifestyle, food choices, and habits. While MNT is provided by the diabetes nutrition specialist, the effectiveness hinges on the support of the entire diabetes management team. Physicians must understand the nutrition approaches an individual is using and reinforce this therapy when interacting with the individual.
Nutrition Survival Skills
Effective diabetes MNT begins with communicating
nutrition survival skills. These are defined as those skills
necessary to avoid emergency situations. Table 5 outlines basic
nutrition survival skills for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
(IDDM) and for individuals with NIDDM using insulin or oral
hypoglycemic agents. Before MNT is initiated, providers initially
responsible for patients diabetes management, whether nurse
educators, diabetes nutrition specialists, or physicians, need to
be assured that patients understand basic nutrition survival
skills. These skills should be conveyed to patients in the first
education sessions.
One of these skills includes knowledge of causes and symptoms and appropriate treatment of hypoglycemia. Individuals should identify their typical symptoms when experiencing hypoglycemia. Treatment should come in the form of carbohydrates with a high percentage of glucose. See Table 6 for specific examples of appropriate treatment. Avoid treating hypoglycemia with a food high in fat, such as ice cream or chocolate bars. The fat in these foods delays the absorption of the carbohydrate and slows the return of euglycemia.
| Table 5. Nutrition Surival Skills |
| 1. Knowledge of
symptoms and treatment of hypoglycemia for all
individuals using insulin or on oral hypoglycemic
agents. 2. Guidelines for alcohol: a. Insulin users: 2 drinks (1 drink = 12 oz. beer, 5 oz. wine, 1 1/2 oz. distilled spirits. b. Non-insulin users: 2 drinks per day but substitute fat calories. Limit if overweight or elevated triglycerides. 3. Coordinate peak of medication with the effect of nutrients and the glucose lower- ing effect of activity or exercise. |
Knowledge of the pharmokinetics of insulin or the oral hypoglycemic agent regimen is essential for safe management of diabetes. Peaks and duration of medication must be planned around an individuals typical schedule, with special consideration to meal timing. Individuals must understand the peak and duration activity of their insulin or oral hypoglycemic agent to prevent hypoglycemia if a usual meal or snack is missed or additional activity or exercise occurs.
The safe use of alcohol must also be reinforced with all individuals taking insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents. Alcohol inhibits gluconeogenesis and interferes with the counterregulatory hormone response needed to prevent hypoglycemia. Specific guidelines regarding alcohol are outlined in Table 5. These should be provided to all appropriate individuals. The need to eat a meal or substantial snack while drinking alcohol should also be discussed.
| Table 6. Treatment of hypoglycemia |
| Blood glucose < 80 mg/dl is treated with 15 grams of quick carbohydrate (glucose tablets, Insta Glucose gel, juice, etc.) |
| Follow by a snack or meal 30-60 minutes after the treatment of hypoglycemia. |
| Avoid high-fat foods (ice cream, chocolate, desserts). |
Approaches To MNT
MNT can be divided into three categories: 1) task, 2)
guideline, and 3) meal planning approaches. Depending on the type
of diabetes and the medical and nutritional goals determined by
the patient and the diabetes management team, specific approaches
are used. Intervention may include only one, or a combination of
several of the approaches discussed below.
Task approaches. Task approaches to MNT are appropriate for use in management of IDDM and NIDDM. The tasks are usually straightforward and objective responsibilities agreed to by providers and patients. Table 7 outlines a variety of nutrition task approaches with their benefits and drawbacks. These approaches provide individuals with guidance to complete a specific task, which will encourage modification of food choices or reinforce positive components of current food choices. The tasks are easily reviewed by patients and diabetes nutrition specialists to assess compliance.
| Table 7. Task approaches | ||
| Approach | Benefits | Drawbacks |
| Food or diabetes management review |
Specific, real life | Requires records |
| Grocery receipt review | Easy, real life | Little focus on meal spacking/medications |
| Individual goal setting | Specific, real life | Constant updating |
| Pre-planned menus | Specific, good place to start | Little flexibility, limits decision making for patient. |
One example of using the task approach would be an individual saving and reviewing itemized grocery re-ceipts. Review of receipts facilitates assessment of food choices while shopping. Additionally, there can be follow-up phone consultations or use of a facsimile machine to review performance and modify or reinforce tasks as necessary. This approach is an effective method of increasing accessibility for provider and patient between clinic visits.
Guideline approaches. The guideline approach to MNT provides individuals with diabetes principles to apply to their current eating habits. Appropriate guidelines are based on an individuals diabetes management goals. Three education pamphlets available through the ADA that facilitate nutrition education via the guideline approach are: The First Step in Diabetes Meal Planning;6 Healthy Food Choices;7 and Eating Healthy Foods.8
Specific guidelines included in these
pamphlets are:
Eat meals and snacks at regular times every day.
Use less fat.
Eat high fiber foods, such as fruits, vegetables, grains,
and beans.
These guidelines are teamed with an individuals current food choices to reach the desired diabetes management goal. For example, a patient eats 12 large meals per day and is inconsistent with the timing and caloric distribution of these meals. Providing the guidance to be consistent with meal times and to coordinate with endogenous or exogenous insulin may be the first step to reaching diabetes management goals for this patient.
Meal planning approaches. The meal planning approach is the intervention most typically associated with nutrition management of diabetes. While the diabetes Exchange Lists is the method most often associated with meal planning, a variety of approaches exist (see Table 8).
| Table 8. Meal planning approaches | ||
Approach |
Benefits |
Drawbacks |
| Food Guide Pyramid1 | Uses for general public spacing | Little focus on meal |
| Healthy Food Choices, Eating Healthy Foods2 | Mixes guidelines with meal plan | Often perceived as diet |
| Exchange Lists for Meal Planning3 | Places emphasis on all nutrient groups | Concept is difficult for many to understand |
| Counting plans | Good approach for specific nutrient intervention | Requires committed learner |
| Carbohydrate | Indications: Intensive therapy | Ignores other nutrients |
| Protein | Indications: Diabetic nephropathy | Ignores other nutrients |
| Fat | Indications: Weight or lipid concerns | Ignores other nutrients |
This form of intervention consists of a variety of meal planning approaches. Three of these meal planning approaches were developed by the ADA and The American Dietetic Association. They are available in written, patient education material through the ADA. The First Step in Diabetes Meal Planning6 and Healthy Food Choices7 are colorful brochures that open out to be 11-by-18-inch posters. They provide basic diabetes nutrition guidelines, as well as a diabetes meal plan. Both of these brochures use a low literacy level. These are good starting points for individuals for whom a meal planning approach is indicated. The Exchange Lists for Meal Planning9 includes six lists of foods, which are grouped into the three major macronutrientscarbohydrate, protein, and fat. The nutrition educator, together with the patient, determine the number of servings from each list appropriate for meals and snacks.
Meal planning approaches that use counting nicely facilitate the modification of a macronutrient. They are an appropriate match when specific nutrient intervention is the goal. Carbohydrate counting is quickly becoming the method of choice for many individuals with IDDM or NIDDM who are interested in following intensive diabetes management. The close relationship of total carbohydrate intake to glycemic control indicates the benefit of carbohydrate counting. Appropriate modification in activity or medication needs to be taken if carbohydrate intake deviates. The ADA and The American Dietetic Association recently published educational pamphlets at three levels of complexity to assist individuals with the meal planning approach.10-12
Fat counting is beneficial in at least two situations. Limiting total fat intake to 30% or less of total calories with less than 10% as saturated fat is an appropriate therapy for individuals with an elevated lipid profile. Additionally, this method is beneficial in eucaloric or hypocaloric meal plans because of the caloric density of fat.
Protein counting is often indicated for individuals with beginning stages of diabetic nephropathy. The ADA Nutrition Guidelines4 suggest 0.8 gm protein/kg of body weight as a beneficial protein modification for controlling the progression of diabetes kidney disease.
Conclusion
MNT is an essential and cost-effective component of
health plans for achieving and maintaining optimal glucose
control. The DCCT demonstrated the benefits of using registered
dietitians with expertise in diabetes and meal planning.3
If you are interested in referring patients to a diabetes nutrition specialist or registered dietitian with expertise in diabetes management, contact your local dietetic association, state ADA affiliate, the American Diabetes Assocation (1-800-DIABETES) or The American Dietetic Association at 1-800-366-1655. Translating the ADA recommendations for MNT into practical and palatable guidelines for individual use is a combination of art and science in diabetes nutrition management.
REFERENCES
1Ney D, Hollingsworth DR: Nutritional management of pregnancy complicated by diabetes: historical perspectives. Diabetes Care 4:647-55, 1981.
2Franz JM, Monk A, Barry B: Effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy provided by dietitians in the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Am Diet A 9:1009-17, 1995.
3Delahanty LN, Halford BN: The role of diet behaviors in achieving improved glycemic control in intensively treated patients in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 16: 1453-58, 1993.
4Franz M, Horton E, Bantle J, Beebe C, Brunzell J, Coulston A, Henry R, Hoogwerf B, Stacpoole P: Nutrition principles for the management of diabetes related complications. Diabetes Care 17: 490-518, 1994.
5The Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children and Adolescents: Report of the expert panel on blood cholesterol levels in children and adolescents. Pediatrics (Suppl.) 89:525-84, 1992.
6The American Diabetes Association and The American Dietetic Association: The First Step in Diabetes Meal Planning. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 1995.
7The American Diabetes Association and The American Dietetic Association: Healthy Food Choices. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 1986.
8The American Diabetes Association and The American Dietetic Association: Eating Healthy Foods. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 1988.
9The American Diabetes Association and The American Dietetic Association: Exchange Lists for Meal Planning. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 1995.
10Daly A, Barry B, Gillespie S, Kulkarni K, Richardson M: Carbohydrate Counting: Getting Started. Alexandria, VA.:American Diabetes Association; Chicago: The American Dietetic Association, 1995.
11Daly A, Barry B, Gellespie S, Kulkarni K, Richardson M: Carbohydrate Counting: Moving On. Alexandria, VA.: American Diabetes Association; Chicago: The American Dietetic Association, 1995.
12Daly A, Barry B, Gillespie S, Kulkarni K, Richardson M: Carbohydrate Counting: Using Carbohydrate/Insulin Ratios. Alexandria, Va.: American Diabetes Association; Chicago: The American Dietetic Association, 1995.
Marie Karlsen, RD, CDE, Dorrine
Khakpour, RD, CDE, and Leslie Lobeda Thomson, MS, RD, are
diabetes nutrition specialists at the Diabetes Care Center,
University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Wash.
Copyright © 1996 American Diabetes Association
Last updated: 6/3/97
For ADA Related Issues contact CustomerService@diabetes.org
For Technical Issues contact webmaster@diabetes.org