Volume 22 Supplement 2
Improving Prognosis in Type 1 Diabetes
Proceedings from an Official Satellite Symposium
of the 16th International Diabetes Federation Congress
These pages are best viewed with Netscape version 3.0 or higher or Internet Explorer version 3.0 or higher. When viewed with other browsers, some characters or attributes may not be rendered correctly.
Dead-in-Bed Syndrome in Young Diabetic Patients
Oddmund Sovik, MD, DRMEDSCI
The so-called dead-in-bed syndrome refers to sudden death in young diabetic patients without any history of long-term complications. Autopsy is typically negative. The present report summarizes frequency data on this condition from studies in the U.K. and the Scandinavian countries. It appears that such deaths occur in 6% of all deaths in diabetic patients below age 40 years. The frequency may also be expressed as 26 events per 100,000 patient-years. The causes are by definition unknown, but a plausible theory is a death in hypoglycemia, since a history of nocturnal hypoglycemia is noted in most cases. While waiting for the clarification of the underlying pathophysiology, one should attempt to identify patients who are at particular risk of hypoglycemia and advocate caution in efforts to normalize blood glucose and HbA1c in these cases.
Diabetes Care 22 (Suppl. 2):B40B42, 1999
During the years 19881990, we observed in Bergen, Norway, four cases of unexpected deaths in young type 1 diabetic patients (1). The patients were found dead in an undisturbed bed, after having been observed in apparently good health the day before. No cause of death was established, and autopsy was not informative. Tattersall and Gill (2) observed 22 similar cases in Great Britain during 1989. The British patients were 1243 years old; most of them had gone to bed in apparently good health and were found dead in the morning. Of the 22 patients, 19 were sleeping alone at the time of the death and 20 were found lying in an undisturbed bed. Most had uncomplicated diabetes and in none were anatomical lesions found at autopsy. The authors suggested a "syndrome" of dead in bed in diabetic patients.
The purpose of this article is to summarize and review some of the available information on this type of death, with particular attention to causal factors, frequency, time trends, therapeutic consequences, and preventive measures.
DEAD-IN-BED SYNDROME: THE CONCEPT To clarify what type of problems we are dealing with, it may be useful to look at a case history from our original publication (1).
This case history presents typical features of what may be called "dead-in-bed syndrome." We are dealing with young people, with no history of diabetic complications, and in particular no autonomic dysfunction. They are found in an undisturbed bed, which seems to exclude death during a convulsive attack. Autopsy (usually without neuropathological studies) is negative.
Obviously, we are not dealing with a syndrome in the strict sense of the term. We are faced with a type of death in diabetic patients that remains unexplained after routine pathological examinations, and which may or may not have a single underlying cause.
MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM In the U.K., 22 cases of dead-in-bed syndrome were reported during a single year (2). The cases were anecdotal and reported to the British Diabetic Association by physicians, relatives, and friends. Thus, the study was not population based, and it was not possible to evaluate the findings in a broader context of diabetes mortality. After the initial report from Norway, a nationwide study was set up in this country for the 10-year period 19811990 (3). During these years, a total of 240 deaths from all causes were ascertained in diabetic patients 039 years of age. Sixteen cases (6.7%) fulfilled the criteria of dead-in-bed syndrome. The Norwegian data may be compared with those of Tunbridge (4), who studied factors contributing to death in 448 diabetic patients who died in the U.K. in 1976. Seven of the deaths corresponded to the dead-in-bed category, and these deaths occurred in the group of 149 patients <40 years of age (Table 1). From the Norwegian and British data, it appears that the dead-in-bed syndrome amounts to 56% of all deaths in diabetic patients under the age of 40. In a Swedish population-based cohort of 4,919 childhood-onset type 1 cases, 33 patients died before the age of 28.5 years (5). Nine of these patients were found dead in bed, having been seen apparently healthy 12 days before death. There were no signs of alcohol or other intoxication, and autopsies were normal except for signs of cerebral hemorrhages in one case and bite marks in the mouth of another case. If the case with cerebral hemorrhages is excluded, we are left with eight cases who fulfill the criteria of dead in bed. This amounts to 24% of all deaths (Table 1). A Danish study covering the 7-year period 19821988 ascertained 226 cases of sudden deaths in insulin-treated patients 050 years of age (6). Of these cases, 51 (23%) were found dead in bed in the morning. In comparing the data (Table 1), it should be noted, however, that the Danish study has a different denominator, namely "sudden deaths," and not all deaths in the diabetic patients. Also, in the Danish study, the age range is different (050 years). In a Swedish cohort of 2,000 diabetic patients, there were 18 deaths by follow-up (7). No case of dead-in-bed syndrome was found in this small group of deaths. Nor was this type of death reported in another young cohort with low numbers of deaths (8). Reported data may also be expressed as number of deaths (events) per 10,000 patient-years (Table 2). Again, data from different studies may not be easily compared, due to varying study design. One may, however, be dealing with 26 events per 10,000 patient-years. This may be considered a small problem, but it is the circumstances of such deaths, rather than the numbers, which is a matter of concern.
CAUSAL FACTORS Discussing the causes of a condition that by definition is unexplained is necessarily a speculative exercise. The most plausible hypothesis is, however, that hypoglycemia, in one way or another, plays a role. Hypoglycemia could be particularly deleterious if associated with insufficient hormonal counter-regulation. A history of nocturnal hypoglycemia was noted in 14 of the British cases reported (2). In our own study (3), frequent episodes of hypoglycemia were noted in 12 cases, with nocturnal episodes in 10 of those. The problem with hypoglycemia as a causal factor is that there are cases of hypoglycemic brain damage and death with a clinical course completely different from those with dead-in-bed syndrome. Thus, in our own material (3), eight patients were brought unconscious to the hospital with hypoglycemia and never regained consciousness.
Another problem pertains to the fact that nocturnal hypoglycemia is a common phenomenon in type 1 diabetes, but a lethal outcome is extremely rare. In the search for pathophysiological mechanisms in the dead-in-bed syndrome of diabetic patients, there may be important lessons to learn from other disorders, particular in the evaluation of cerebral versus cardiac factors. Sudden death is thus associated with physical exercise (9) and epilepsy (10), but existing data from those conditions are not helpful in explaining the dead-in-bed syndrome. Concerning a cardiac event, sudden death has been associated with QT-prolongation and ventricular arrhythmia (11). A modest QT prolongation was found in a third of diabetic patients with definite autonomic neuropathy, but in none with normal or borderline autonomic function (12). It has been speculated that patients with similar pen injectors for short-acting premeal bolus injection and bedtime intermediate insulin might use the wrong pen injector at bedtime and go to sleep without realizing their mistake, and therefore be at risk of severe nocturnal hypoglycemia (13). So far there are no data to support this notion.
TIME TRENDS In the Norwegian study, 12 of the 16 deaths occurred in the years 1988, 1989, and 1990. There were significantly more cases of dead-in-bed syndrome in 19861990 than in the previous 5-year period (P< 0.0003). By contrast, the Danish study revealed no increase during the years 19821988 (6). In Norway, the increased occurrence of dead-in-bed syndrome coincided with three major shifts in insulin treatment, namely the introduction of human insulin, insulin 100 U/ml, and common use of multiple daily insulin injections.
Concerning insulin 100 U/ml, it is not likely that the increased strength of insulin should lead to accidents 2 years after the transition period (1987). The human insulin controversy, with its confusing and conflicting literature, will not be reviewed here. There is no convincing scientific evidence in favor of the contention that human insulin leads to loss of hypoglycemia warning symptoms (14,15). What remains as an important point of discussion, however, is the shifting therapeutic trend during the 1980s toward a common use of treatment regimens with multiple daily doses of rapid-acting insulin. It is now well established that efforts to normalize blood glucose and decrease HbA1c carry an increased risk of hypoglycemia, often during night. In the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, intensive therapy was associated with a threefold increase in the risk of severe hypoglycemia (16), and severe hypoglycemia occurred more often during sleep (17). The risk of hypoglycemia associated with intensive treatment may be even greater in routine clinical settings, with less-motivated patients and less resources for supervision and follow-up.
PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES A common question asked by adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes is the following: Could I die if my blood sugar falls during the night? Several years ago, most diabetologists would say definitely no. With present-day knowledge, we are not so sure. In fact, it has become very difficult to talk with young diabetic patients about this question. Without concealing the facts, one should probably shift focus to preventive measures. Patients with frequent hypoglycemic reactions, with or without nocturnal hypoglycemia, need extensive education and instruction. One should be cautious in recommending near-normal blood glucose and HbA1c in these patients, particularly if they sleep alone. In physically active patients, one should focus on the problem of late postexercise hypoglycemia.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The dead-in-bed syndrome refers to unexpected deaths in young diabetic patients without any history of complications. The patients die in their sleep and are found in an undisturbed bed, apparently excluding a convulsive attack. Autopsy is typically negative. The causes are by definition unknown, but the most plausible theory is a death in hypoglycemia. The deaths may be related to the more intensive insulin treatment regimens introduced during the 1980s. Fortunately, these tragedies are not very common, occurring in about 6% of all deaths in diabetic patients <40 years of age. While we are waiting for clarification of the underlying pathophysiology, one should attempt to identify patients who are at particular risk of hypoglycemia and advocate caution in efforts to normalize blood glucose and HbA1c levels in these cases.
Acknowledgments Our studies of mortality in young diabetic patients are supported by the Norwegian Directory of Health.
7. Nyström L, Östman J, Wall S, Wibell L, and the Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden (DISS) Group: Mortality of all incident cases of diabetes mellitus in Sweden diagnosed 19831987 at age 1534 years. Diabet Med 9:422427, 1992
10. Jay GW, Leetsma JE: Sudden death in epilepsy: a comprehensive review of the literature and proposed mechanisms. Acta Neurol Scand 63 (Suppl. 82):166, 1981
11. Vlay SC, Mallis GI, Brown EJ, Cohn PF: Documented sudden cardiac death in prolonged QT syndrome. Arch Int Med 144:833835, 1984
From the Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Oddmund Sovik, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway. E-mail: email@example.com.
Received for publication 27 May 1998 and accepted in revised form 20 August 1998.
This article is based on a presentation at a satellite symposium of the 16th International Diabetes Federation Congress. The symposium and the publication of this article were made possible by educational grants from Hoechst Marion Roussel AG.
Copyright © 1999 American Diabetes Association
For Technical Issues contact firstname.lastname@example.org